Hillary Strategist: Illegal Immigrants And Their Relatives May be ‘Most Powerful Political Force’ in America
October 10th, 2007Oh really? Isn’t that special. The invaders are more powerful than American citizens? Well I’m glad you showed the world where Hillary is investing her campaign and it’s not with America or American citizens. I am CERTAIN that the issuing of driver’s licenses to illegal aliens in New York has EVERYTHING to do with getting a few thousand illegal aliens through the voting booths undetected and she is banking on them voting for HER. This underscores how important it will be to ensure integrity at the voting booths in 2008 and requiring MORE than a New York driver’s license to be able to vote. Our future depends upon the sanctity of the right to vote being given ONLY to legal citizens. We need to start now in demanding that our election process WILL NOT ALLOW ILLEGAL ALIENS TO VOTE.
The Dems are trying every which way to either get amnesty for them or if that fails, at least they can get NY driver’s licenses and register to vote that way. They are shameless PIGS in their endless attempts to back door amnesty and give citizenship away like it is some kind of cheap raffle ticket.
If Hillary becomes President in 2008, I’m leaving the United States!
Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s chief strategist, Mark Penn, told a British magazine last week that illegal immigrants “may be the most powerful political force in the country.”
In an interview with The Spectator magazine, Penn said, “The most powerful political force in [America], and the most important voting bloc in the upcoming elections, may not even be able to vote — but their cousins can. And that may make all the difference.’
Interviewer Matthew d’Ancona also noted, ‘the radicalisation of illegal migrants to America, Penn thinks, could determine the next presidential election because their grievances will encourage their legally settled relatives to register and vote.”
I have news for ya Matthew - the radicalisation of illegal ALIENS is only serving to PISS OFF US AMERICAN CITIZENS TO THE POINT WE WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR THE LIKES OF ANYONE WHO SUPPORTS ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. FURTHERMORE, IT HAS MOBILIZED THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO BOUNCE ALL INCUMBENTS OUT OF OFFICE BECAUSE CLEARLY THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT IS THE WORST THING SINCE BRITISH RULE IN THE 1700′S.
In his recent book, Microtrends, Penn wrote:
Just look at what has happened in the U.S. to illegal immigrants. A few years ago, they were the forgotten Americans, hiding from daylight and the authorities. Today they are holding political rallies, and given where they and their legal, voting relatives live, they may turn out to be the new Soccer Moms. Militant immigrants fed up with a broken immigration system just may be the most important voters in the next presidential election, distributed in the key Southwest states that are becoming the new battleground areas.
And you are just HOPING that the 2010 census will give the southwest even more seats due to the fact that the Census COUNTS ILLEGAL ALIENS. THAT PRACTICE NEEDS TO STOP ASAP AND THEN WE CAN GET BACK TO THE PROPER NUMBER OF SEATS REPRESENTING ONLY AMERICAN CITIZENS.
Penn’s client, Hillary Clinton, has courted this demographic since the beginning of her campaign. In a recent interview with Hispanic Trending, Clinton said, “when I’m President, I will work to pass immigration reform that honors our history as both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws, and that includes a path to legalization.”
As a senator, Clinton denounced past efforts to crack down on illegal immigration.
Thankfully, we get to hear from the common sense side of things and Mark Krikorian gives the REAL picture that is emerging and that is - WE ARE PISSED AND WE ARE THE MAJORITY.
Mark Kirkorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a group which staunchly opposes illegal immigration, has some doubts about the political potency of illegal immigrants’ relatives. He pointed to the short-lived impact of marches in the past two years, and two separate mobilizations this year against comprehensive immigration plans that opponents said amounted to amnesty.
As to the presidential election being determined by the political mobilization of Hispanic citizens, Kirkorian says, “it could happen if the electoral vote count is close enough, but it can only make a difference at the margins, since all Hispanics, of recent immigrant origin or not, will account for only a little more than 6 percent of the vote. The problem for Penn is that meeting the demands of the elites who claim to speak for immigrants —amnesty for illegals, ever-looser enforcement, increased legal immigration — holds the real potential to radicalize Americans, making immigration a much higher-saliency issue than it usually is — and that’s not a micro-trend.”
The Clinton campaign has not replied to a Friday request for elaboration on Penn’s remark.
I recently sent this response to Mexica Movement who say they have a right to go anywhere on their continent:
Native peoples did not travel freely across the continent. There were 500 tribes in the US alone. If you think one set of immigration laws is intolerable, try 500. If a tribal member traveled he would soon come upon another tribe, each tribe with it’s own attitudes about their territory and how they dealt with others. Especially if tribes were at war, it was easy to be killed because one was from another tribe.
We are not living in 1492 or 1848. This is not about your indigenous race, it’s about speaking Spanish. Why aren’t you speaking in your native tongues? It would be like the tower of babble. That north America has three languages instead of the hundreds and hundreds and hundreds it replaced is a gift. You communicate in English and Spanish.
I will take 100 English speaking brown people over 100 white Spanish speaking people any day. I have no problem with Canadians of any race who come here speaking English. To say that Mexican citizens would not resent being invaded by millions of English speakers and changing their culture is a lie.
It’s funny that Mexico turns away Spanish speaking “immigrants” at their own southern border. Go to Mexico and protest, see if their government uses rubber bullets like our country does. Mexico enforces it’s immigration laws like most countries, why shouldn’t we?
Oh, and your “protest” photo saying white illegals in the US is okkk, it’s not. We don’t want white illegals who speak Spanish. You are the racists, as evidenced by your many racist signs. It’s about culture, not race. Spanish speaking is a threat to our homogenous society. Why should we replace one language with two? It’s illogical. If you really want to turn down the heat, replace English as a Second Language with English as the Primary Language when coming here.
Are you working strongly to revive the hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of different tribal languages? Why does your website only have two languages? Could it be to communicate? I don’t care if the language was Cherokee. If that was the one language that had ended up the language of the US 300 million of us would speak it. I suspect there are practical reasons that English happened to win out. First, it is a written language; the vast majority of historical languages world wide are not written. Second, it is conducive to technology; it must be an efficient language since it won out.
Ken Pope
kenpop54@earthlink.net
EarthLink Revolves Around You.